Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Announcement:Duality Open Period - 26/10 to 30/10 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The new Gallente destroyer has six turret hard points. It was advertised as having five with a utility high. Error or stealth change?
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.10.27 12:14:00
|
2. Sticky:Testing ASB adjustments on Duality - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
In order for me to decide to use an ASB over a shield extender, it has to produce enough shield points not only to replace what the extender would have given me, but also the hitpoints that would have come from the higher regeneration rate that co...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.23 07:53:00
|
3. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
War dec changes make sense. You should have to shop and compare allies in the mercenary market place. Not have a free dog pile.
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.06.11 15:12:00
|
4. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
There is alot of confusion with the cap batteries. Their description and attributes on SISSI indicate they're just Nuet/Nos resistant. People testing them indicate that the effect is partially cast back the aggressor. This was indicated in the dev...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.05.15 15:52:00
|
5. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The ancillary shield booster is an overly complicated shield circuit breaker. Divorce it completely from a ship's capacitor to ensure it is at least used as such.
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.05.04 21:03:00
|
6. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Tsubutai wrote: CCP SoniClover wrote: Regarding the fueled shield booster - I doubled the effect, the cap use and the capacity. So you can carry more, each charge will be much more effective, but running the module without charges is crippli...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.05.04 16:59:00
|
7. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ohh Yeah wrote: If you can, could you please describe to me a scenario when the ancillary shield booster is more effective than a regular shield booster and a cap injector? I am unable to think of such a situation. Assuming they make i...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.05.04 02:27:00
|
8. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
SISSI was very buggy just now. I wasn't able to test the new shield/cap booster modules like I wanted to in combat. I'll log back on later and try it out. Here's what I was able to do: Modified my Harpy... I have a Genolution CA-1 a...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.05.03 22:43:00
|
9. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The AF are much more effective against larger ships. And while you may see some pilots get those rare kill mails they are supposed to be heavy tackle - grab the enemy and hold on for that minute it takes for support to arrive. Small ships are ski...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.24 06:02:00
|
10. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Prometheus Exenthal wrote: It always made good sense to me for the non-cloaky T2 frigates to get a sig bonus. ie: interceptors, afs, eafs I'm going to derail. I've read some of your ideas on another forum. Some are quite appealing. Trading...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.23 04:41:00
|
11. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'll take the category 'Didn't read the thread' for 200 Alex. The Jaguar went from top of the pile to bottom. And the Enyo moved so far ahead of the Ishkur in the DPS department it isn't even funny. The biggest impression I got on SISSI was how cl...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.22 23:04:00
|
12. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Anyone ever stumble upon an arty jag setup that actually worked? Before the jag CPU buff I was liking this: High: 280mm II x 3 Mid: Limited 1MN MWD Small cap booster II PWNG TP Warp Disruptors II Low: MAPC II TE II x 3 Rigs: Projecile burst Pr...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.22 15:59:00
|
13. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
AF are done then. I hope EAS are next.
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.22 04:21:00
|
14. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You can yell until you're blue - CCP Tallest I not a 'forum' person. He does a great job but if you get two posts from him in a thread you should consider yourself lucky.
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.21 19:30:00
|
15. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
John Nucleus wrote: I believe the pros and cons of Laser are balanced with other weapon system. Therefore, having to waste a bonus in order to use them is not justified. Apparently, this bonus was introduced when Laser were better than other we...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.21 05:32:00
|
16. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Crucible features page indicates this is rolling out on Tuesday. If you subtract out the weekend, CCP Tallest should update today, tomorrow, or Monday at the latest.
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.19 13:41:00
|
17. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
FFS - you guys realize that with the extra mids many of these AF can now use dual propulsion, right?!? You get the best of both worlds. Get on top of the target using the MWD. Then go to AB. When I started the game the first look I had of AF was...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.19 01:58:00
|
18. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Zircon Dasher wrote: 8% is a dodgy statistic that came from one of the last QENs. another dodgy statistic: low sec accounts for ~25% of all PvP related ship explosions (from the "you guys like blowing stuff up" dev blog). This was the sour...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.18 00:26:00
|
19. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It's more 'just say no' Republicans. But bringing up politics is bad form.
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.17 23:40:00
|
20. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Once you get out of the niche of low-sec, frigate combat is really on life support. And there are many reasons for that. Some are economic and related to isk generation. People have created high-sec alts to run Incursions and don't rat in null. . ...
- by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.01.17 23:22:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |